IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

Journal excerpts that visually document task assignments and reflective observations

Comprehensive CRAAP table applying rigorous criteria for source evaluation

Thoughtful discussion of self-management and communication skills during production challenges

Clear examples of adapting ATL strategies to maintain momentum under project constraints

ATL monitoring tables need more entries and reflective commentary to show growth over multiple stages

Descriptions of ATL skills would benefit from linking to measurable outcomes (e.g., time saved, error reduction)

Lack of deeper analysis in the second ATL monitoring table regarding how coping strategies evolved

Compelling learning goal tied to personal passion for equestrian life and jewelry design

Use of KWH and SMART frameworks to structure objectives into measurable, time-bound targets

Detailed success-criteria table with tiered benchmarks for aesthetics and durability

Acknowledgement of the need for adaptability in the action plan, demonstrating realistic project management

Lack of precise start/end dates and measurable metrics for each ATL skill in the action plan

SMART criteria are not explicitly linked to specific project tasks or deliverables

Absence of a detailed sequence of steps and an itemized resource list for project feasibility

Insightful final reflection linking project challenges to personal growth in design abilities and self-management

Use of direct user feedback from surveys to ground product evaluation in real audience data

Effective visualizations (pie charts) that enhance transparency of ease-of-use and design appeal findings

Clear reflection on achieving learning goals through identification of specific ATL challenges

Personal reflection would be stronger with concrete evidence (e.g., journal entries, timeline adjustments) to illustrate improved flexibility and stress management

Product evaluation lacks completed sections on manufacturing and cost criteria

Product-evaluation table stops mid-analysis and needs full justification for each criterion

Survey data are not fully woven into the narrative to demonstrate how feedback drove design improvements