IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

Effective transfer of Chemistry curriculum knowledge to explain remedy mechanisms

Robust source evaluation using OPVL, demonstrating critical research skills

Insightful analysis of author bias and credibility, reflecting deep critical thinking

Limited examples of ATL skills applied to the product (e.g. digital design, communication tools)

ATL skill terminology is not explicitly referenced, reducing clarity of alignment

Application of collaboration and self-management skills in product development is underdeveloped

Well-defined success criteria tailored with ACCESS FM for a digital guidebook

A vivid personal interest narrative that convincingly links heritage to the project

Clear articulation of the intended product with concise objectives and outcomes

A detailed action plan and Gantt chart that demonstrate strong self-management and scheduling

Success criteria lack quantifiable benchmarks for evaluation (e.g. target percentages)

Learning goal and cultural narrative need measurable milestones and tighter focus

Resource needs, task dependencies and critical milestones are not fully specified

Contingency planning for delays (buffer days) is not integrated into the schedule

Insightful reflection on evolving beliefs, demonstrating strong metacognitive growth

Honest evaluation of improved self- and time-management skills with relevant examples

Effective linkage of project outcomes to future applications

Recommendations for improvement are not explicitly mapped back to original success criteria

Future contingency strategies are mentioned but lack concrete, actionable steps

Product evaluation would benefit from a clear mapping of each success criterion to specific evidence in the guidebook