IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

Your OPVL analysis table for the trading article is precise and insightful, highlighting robust Information Literacy and critical evaluation of sources.

You clearly explain how you used information-literacy strategies (pre-formulated questions, expert sessions) to deepen your understanding of BTST concepts.

The color-coded calendar view exemplifies strong Self-Management ATL skills, helping you maintain momentum and reduce stress.

Your OPVL critical thinking demonstrates rigorous source validation, bolstering the credibility of your research.

Including a screenshot of the expert Zoom call illustrates your effective Communication ATL skills and secures primary data.

The transfer of academic theory to live market data in your price table shows adept application of Transfer ATL skills.

Your creative-thinking mind map for structuring chapters enhances reader engagement and reflects innovative organization.

The narrative of your secondary research showcases strong Organization ATL skills in structuring and validating online resources.

The secondary research paragraph, while informative, could be more concise—condense to maintain reader engagement and sharpen focus.

When describing Communication ATL skills, add specific examples of how expert feedback led to content revisions in your guide to illustrate tangible impact.

Your creative-thinking description is vivid; linking it to concrete changes in chapter layout or structure would strengthen the evidence of its influence.

You establish a compelling connection between your learning goal and personal interest by citing early exposure to trading, enhancing authenticity and motivation.

Your action plan table comprehensively maps tasks to success criteria and resources, demonstrating clear alignment with project objectives.

The brainstorming mind map effectively organizes varied project options, showcasing a thorough idea-generation process that underpins your final direction.

Success criteria are detailed but lack sequencing with deadlines or checkpoints, reducing the plan’s precision and trackability.

The learning goal would benefit from more measurable success criteria (e.g., specifying exact quantities or standards) to sharpen focus and assess outcomes.

While your action plan is thorough, it needs explicit dependencies and time estimates to clarify project flow and ensure feasibility.

You draw insightful connections between learner profile attributes (principled, open-minded) and your project journey, demonstrating deep self-awareness.

Your reflection on personal growth—balancing academic and project responsibilities—feels authentic and detailed, illustrating enhanced resilience and organizational skill.

The clear header introducing product evaluation sets up a systematic critique against success criteria, reflecting structured reflective practice.

Your strengths-and-weaknesses table is candid but needs action steps to address identified weaknesses, completing the reflective cycle.

In the product evaluation table, explicitly stating the achieved level against each criterion would clarify your self-assessment.

The reflection on impact lacks some specific evidence showing how you will implement improvements or next steps.