This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
IB Economics IA Examples | RevisionDojo
IB Economics IA Examples
Browse top scoring exemplars of IB Economics IA with SL/HL samples, examiner-style feedback, criteria breakdowns, and real student Internal Assessment exemplars.
Lots of students struggle to decode their Economics Internal Assessment grade and assessment.
This is a free grading tool that breaks down the IB Economics IA rubric into plain English, so you understand exactly where your portfolio of three commentaries stands across all four assessment criteria.
The embedded grader makes self-evaluation faster and more accurate than manual rubric checking, so you're never left guessing.
Note
The grader works in two modes:
Draft Mode: Quick assessment of your work-in-progress. Input your current commentary sections and get instant feedback on which criteria need more work before you finish writing.
Full Mode: Complete evaluation of your finished IA portfolio. Input your final commentary details across all criteria and get a comprehensive grade breakdown with specific improvement suggestions for each section.
Quick Start Checklist
Before using the grader, ensure you understand these key elements:
Three Economics Commentaries - Each 750 words maximum, covering different economic concepts and real-world situations
Economics Theory Application - Must demonstrate understanding of microeconomics, macroeconomics, and international economics concepts
Real-World Articles - Three different published news articles from credible sources within 12 months of writing
Economic Analysis - Critical evaluation of economic issues using appropriate diagrams, calculations, and theoretical frameworks
Word Count Verification - Each commentary maximum 750 words (bibliography and diagrams excluded from count)
Complete Structure - Title, source reference, summary, analysis, evaluation, and conclusion for each commentary
Economic Diagrams - Hand-drawn or computer-generated diagrams with proper labeling and economic accuracy
Bibliography - Proper citation of news articles and any additional economic sources used
Rubric Breakdown
Criterion A: Knowledge and Understanding of Economics (10 marks)
This criterion tests your grasp of economic concepts, theories, and terminology.
It evaluates whether you demonstrate clear understanding of economic principles across your three commentaries.
Mark Band
What It Means
Evidence You Must Show
0
No economic knowledge
No understanding of economic concepts or inappropriate use of terminology
1-2
Limited knowledge
Basic understanding with minimal use of economic terminology
3-4
Satisfactory knowledge
Some understanding with appropriate use of economic concepts
5-6
Good knowledge
Clear understanding with good use of economic terminology and concepts
7-8
Very good knowledge
Comprehensive understanding with effective use of economic concepts
9-10
Excellent knowledge
Sophisticated understanding with expert use of economic terminology and theory
Criterion B: Application and Analysis (10 marks)
This evaluates your ability to identify economic issues and apply economic theory to real-world situations.
It assesses how well you analyze economic data and connect theory to practice.
Mark Band
What It Means
Evidence You Must Show
0
No application
No connection between economic theory and real-world situations
1-2
Limited application
Basic identification of economic issues with minimal theory application
3-4
Satisfactory application
Some economic theory application with appropriate analysis
5-6
Good application
Clear theory application with good economic analysis
7-8
Very good application
Effective theory application with strong economic analysis
9-10
Excellent application
Sophisticated theory application with expert economic analysis
Criterion C: Synthesis and Evaluation (10 marks)
This is the most challenging criterion - testing your ability to evaluate economic arguments and synthesize information.
It assesses your critical thinking skills and ability to weigh economic evidence.
Mark Band
What It Means
Evidence You Must Show
0
No evaluation
Purely descriptive, no economic evaluation
1-2
Limited evaluation
Some basic evaluation but mainly descriptive
3-4
Satisfactory evaluation
Clear evaluation with some economic reasoning
5-6
Good evaluation
Strong evaluation with good economic judgment
7-8
Very good evaluation
Comprehensive evaluation with balanced economic assessment
9-10
Excellent evaluation
Sophisticated evaluation with original economic insights and nuanced judgment
Criterion D: Use of Appropriate Skills (10 marks)
This assesses professional presentation and economic communication skills.
It includes diagram quality, economic terminology, and adherence to academic conventions.
Missing economic calculations → Include elasticity calculations, percentage changes, or economic indicators where relevant
Inadequate economic terminology → Use precise economic vocabulary and technical terms appropriately
Word count violations → Stay within 750 words per commentary; only first 750 words are marked
Generic conclusions → Base conclusions on specific economic evidence and theoretical analysis
Poor source citation → Use consistent citation style and credible economic sources
FAQs
Can I use the same article for multiple commentaries?
No - each commentary must use a different article from a different source.
How recent should my articles be?
Articles must be published within 12 months of writing your commentary.
Should my commentaries connect to each other?
No - each commentary should be independent and cover different economic areas.
What level of economic detail is expected?
Include economic mechanisms and theoretical principles but ensure accessibility to educated readers.
How important are economic diagrams?
Very important - include supply/demand curves, market diagrams, economic models, and data graphs.
Can I focus on specific countries or regions?
Yes - country-specific or regional analysis provides focused scope and practical relevance.
Should I include statistical analysis?
Where relevant - elasticity calculations and quantitative analysis enhance commentary quality.
How detailed should my evaluation be?
Provide comprehensive assessment of economic arguments with balanced judgment rather than one-sided analysis.
Can I use government reports?
Sparingly - prioritize news articles as primary sources with government data as supporting evidence.
What makes an Economics IA stand out?
Current economic relevance, sophisticated analysis, quantitative evaluation, and original synthesis of economic concepts.
Use the Free Economics IA Grader Now
Stop guessing about your grade.
The comprehensive grading tool evaluates your IA portfolio against all four official criteria, giving instant feedback on strengths and improvement areas.
Input your commentary details and get a preliminary grade calculation that helps you focus revision efforts where they matter most.
Economics-specific analysis helps you master the economic theory application and critical evaluation that separate excellent from averageEconomics Internal Assessments.
AI Grader Tool
How the Grader Works and Frequently Asked Questions
Comprehensive Feedback
Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.
Frequently Asked Questions
IB Economics IA Assessment Guide
Join 600k+ students breezing through the IBReady to breeze through the IB?
Subject specific rubrics
View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down by criteria strands.
Secure by design
All files are deleted within 48 hours. We do not train on your data.