Browse top scoring exemplars of IB Chemistry EE with A-E grades, examiner-style feedback, criteria breakdowns, and real student Extended Essay exemplars.
The help center covers plans, billing, marking and troubleshooting, and you can message us from there.
Visit the help centerThe grader works in two modes:
The Chemistry EE is assessed using five criteria, totalling 34 marks:
| Mark Band | Description | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Research question is absent or inappropriate; method is unsuitable. | No clear research question; method lacks relevance. |
| 1–2 | Research question is present but lacks clarity; method is partially appropriate. | Research question stated; method somewhat aligns with the question. |
| 3–4 | Clear research question; method is appropriate but lacks full justification. | Well-defined question; method aligns but lacks detailed explanation. |
| 5–6 | Sharply focused research question; well-justified and effective method. | Clearly stated question; method is thoroughly explained and justified. |
| Mark Band | Description | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Minimal understanding; significant inaccuracies. | Misinterpretation of basic concepts; errors in chemical principles. |
| 1–2 | Some understanding; several inaccuracies. | Basic concepts understood; multiple errors present. |
| 3–4 | Good understanding; minor inaccuracies. | Most concepts correctly applied; few errors. |
| 5–6 | Excellent understanding; concepts applied accurately. | All relevant concepts correctly applied; no significant errors. |
| Mark Band | Description | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 | Limited analysis; arguments are unsupported. | Descriptive content; lacks critical evaluation. |
| 4–6 | Some analysis; arguments are partially supported. | Attempts at evaluation; some arguments lack depth. |
| 7–9 | Good analysis; arguments are well-supported. | Clear evaluation; most arguments are insightful. |
| 10–12 | Excellent analysis; arguments are insightful and fully supported. | Thorough evaluation; all arguments are critically examined. |
| Mark Band | Description | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Disorganized; numerous formatting errors. | Lack of structure; inconsistent formatting throughout. |
| 1–2 | Some organization; several formatting inconsistencies. | Basic structure present; noticeable formatting issues. |
| 3–4 | Well-organized; consistent formatting. | Clear structure; minimal formatting errors. |
| Mark Band | Description | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| 0–2 | Limited reflection; minimal personal engagement. | Basic descriptions; lacks insight into the research process. |
| 3–4 | Some reflection; personal engagement is evident. | Discusses challenges and learning experiences; some insight. |
| 5–6 | In-depth reflection; strong personal engagement. | Critically evaluates the research process; demonstrates significant personal growth. |
If you're between bands, focus on Criterion C (Critical Thinking) - it offers the biggest impact for improvement.
IB Extended Essay grade boundaries are consistent across subjects but can vary slightly by session:
| IB Grade | Mark Range (out of 34) | Percentage | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 27-34 | 79-100% | Excellent |
| B | 21-26 | 62-76% | Good |
| C | 14-20 | 41-59% | Satisfactory |
| D | 7-13 | 21-38% | Mediocre |
| E | 0-6 | 0-18% | Elementary |
And quick fixes:
Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.
The help center covers plans, billing, marking and troubleshooting, and you can message us from there.
Visit the help centerView your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down by criteria strands.
All files are deleted within 48 hours. We do not train on your data.